Bibliography

Russell, Paul, “Canyt oes aruer: Gwilym Wasta and the laws of court in Welsh law”, North American Journal of Celtic Studies 1:2 (November, 2017): 173–188.

  • journal article
Citation details
Contributors
Article
Canyt oes aruer: Gwilym Wasta and the laws of court in Welsh law”
Periodical
North American Journal of Celtic Studies 1:2 (2017)
Eska, Joseph F. (ed.), North American Journal of Celtic Studies 1:1–2 (May-November, 2017), Ohio State University Press.
Volume
1
Pages
173–188
Description
Abstract (cited)
It is conventional to divide the manuscript tradition of the Blegywryd redaction of the Welsh laws into two groups depending on whether they contain the Laws of Court and where the triads are positioned. It has long been recognised that Gwilym Wasta (working ca. 1300) was the scribe of the three manuscripts which do not contain the Laws of Court and that in three of the manuscripts he replaced them with a colophon in which he seems to claim that he has omitted them because they were no longer in use. This paper argues that matters might be rather more complicated and that the omission of the Laws of Court may have been more by accident than design.
Subjects and topics
Headings
medieval Welsh law
Sources
Texts
History, society and culture
Agents
Gwilym Was DaGwilym Was Da
(fl. c. 1300)
Gwilym Wasta
al. Gwilym Wasta, Welsh scribe
See more
Contributors
Dennis Groenewegen
Page created
January 2018, last updated: April 2018