Manuscripts
Results for M (3056)

Collection of Irish saints’ Lives in Latin. It is generally taken to be an early copy of Rawlinson B 485 and since the latter is now mutilated in places, fills in a number of important gaps. The order of the Lives has been rearranged to follow the calendar of feast-days.

  • s. xivex
  • Mattheus Ó Duibhidhir, Cormac Óg Mac Muircheartaigh
  • Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Rawlinson B 505/ff. 1-210/ff. 1-210
Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Rawlinson B 505

An incomplete copy of the Félire Óengusso and its commentary.

  • s. xv
  • Cormac Óg Mac Muircheartaigh
Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Rawlinson B 506

Irish genealogical tracts and a copy of the Dinnshenchas Érenn

  • s. xiv (+ xvii)
  • Seáan Ó Cianáin, Anonymous [Rawl. B 506 (ff. 11r-15v)], Anonymous [Rawl. B 506 (f. 16ar)]
Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Rawlinson B 506

Irish legal material.

  • s. xiv
  • Anonymous [Rawl. B 506 (ff. 16br–62v)]
  • s. xv / s. xvi
  • Maelechlainn Ó Maoil Chonaire
Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Rawlinson B 512
  • c. 1500
  • Conchubhar Ó Maoil Chonaire, Dubthach Ó Duibhgeannáin

Part III (ff. 75B-100 + ff. 37-44) of Rawlinson B 512, written by an anonymous scribe

  • s. xv
  • Ó Maoil Chonaire family
Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Rawlinson B 512
Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Rawlinson B 512
  • Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Rawlinson B 513
  • s. xvi
  • Giolla Riabhach Mór Ó Cléirigh
  • Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Rawlinson C 699

Contains version D of the Latin redaction of the Welsh laws

  • c. 1300
  • Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Rawlinson D 913

A copy of the Nova legenda Angliae, written in 1499 by Jacobus Neel of Rouen and commissioned by Thomas Goldston (II), prior of Christ Church, Canterbury. There are additions in another hand. 301 ff.

  • 1499
  • Jacobus Neel of Rouen, John Prise
  • Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Top. gen. c.3
  • Oxford, Corpus Christi College, MS 129

A missal commonly thought to have been produced in Ireland in the 11th or 12th century. Scholars have attempted to arrive at a more precise date and provenance, with varying conclusions. Much of the discussion has tended to focus on its artistic affinities with other illuminated manuscripts and the relationship of its textual contents to the reform movement of the 12th century, or lack of evidence for this, pointing to an earlier date of the manuscript if not of its texts.

  • s. xi2 / s. xii1